Wifi midi controller

You can also use the editor software to save and load all of your Vortex presets to and from your hard drive for easy backup. Please follow and like us:. Downloads Docs and Downloads. Add to cart. Support John Jim. The Neova Ring is a brand new idea from Enhancia that will be available in March Since , the individual members of the group have released music on various labels — DUB, Studio!

It is aimed toward amateurs who would like to experiment with EEG. However, if you are a pro in any of the fields of electronics, neurofeedback, software development etc. Instead of being in the background pushing buttons or keys, the Eigenharp brings the electronic musician centre stage.

It plays a limitless range of sounds, all of which can be expressed using the highly sensitive keys, strip controllers and optional breathpipe. The keys themselves have around 10 times the touch sensitivity of a conventional keyboard… The Eigenharp can play back most sampler and software instruments, Apple Loops, MIDI instruments and SoundFonts.

I use Apollo midi for Bluetooth midi between devices. It is easy to set up and stable. You have to install the StudioMux server on your PC. This almost always works flawlessly. BTW, I believe bluetooth midi between devices is meant to be a feature of AB3 once Michael gets around to making it work. Nudge, nudge I believe that Network Session is all that you need. Rodolfo said: I believe that Network Session is all that you need.

Editing the sounds can also be done onboard, using a small 2-line LED display, a Menu button, and the arrow keys. Fortunately, Roland has a free editing app available for iOS and Android devices which does the job really well, and we would consider it a necessity for doing any customisation at all on the Aerophone.

A feature available on the editor, but not on the instrument itself, is the ability to layer four different sounds within one patch, each with its own pitch, volume, envelope and filter offsets, LFO, bend range, and effects sends. The sounds in the Aerophone are very well-chosen and eminently usable in performance. Most sax players will feel totally comfortable as soon as they pick up the instrument and will be pleased with the quality and the variety of sounds.

There are a few things about it, however, that we wish Roland had done differently. For one thing, I would worry about its robustness onstage. The plastic body, although solid, feels like it could shatter if you dropped it hard enough. If you use the DC power supply, which we think most players would prefer, and the external audio output, and the USB output, you will have three different cables emerging from different places on the body, and that could easily lead to an accident, especially given how short the power supply cable is.

The data coming from the MIDI output is a little strange, which would make it hard to use with external sound sources. How the device generates MIDI depends on the settings of the internal voice, which is fine since you can define all of the various controller outputs and their ranges.

You can also specify a minimum and maximum velocity that is generated when you start to blow or change notes. Conversely, if you are holding a note and then re-attack it louder with your breath or tongue, the velocity of the second note will be lower than the initial note.

And some synth features, such as velocity-controlled envelopes, may simply not be usable. Finally, because the instrument is so closely modelled after a saxophone, it would seem that players of oboes, bassoons, clarinets, and flutes would have a harder time adjusting to it than an EWI or WX.

Despite its quirks, we like the Aerophone. Electronic Musician magazine is the ultimate resource for musicians who want to make better music, in the studio or onstage.

In each and every issue it surveys all aspects of music production - performance, recording, and technology, from studio to stage and offers product news and reviews on the latest equipment and services.